A Political Post-Mortem

August 24, 2010 at 1:34 am (Uncategorized)

Okay. Let’s take a big breath and have a look at what went down here over the weekend, and the issue of what may happen next. I’ll have to tread carefully, though, and walk slowly through the bodies, debris and spent rounds, because this has never happened in my lifetime, and like everyone else I am feeling my way through this new post-party world.

A post-party world – of course it’s not that or anything like that, but it is true that neither major party won enough seats on Saturday to form government, and it’s also true that the balance of power in the House of Representatives looks likely to be held by three Independents and a Green, the last of whom made history by winning the seat of Melbourne on Saturday night – the first such win for the Greens at a federal election.

The final counting is unlikely to be completed until next week, with record postal votes still being processed (not to mention huge numbers of informal and donkey votes – the latter being votes that are deliberately invalidated – an ‘Up yours, the lot of you’ gesture – the former accidentally so), and results so close we are still seeing the pendulum swing in excruciatingly small degrees in the undecided seats. Currently I believe Labor has won 72 and the Coalition 70, with 4 undecided, although the article I just read suggested Labor’s expected to win one of those, with the other 3 likely headed to the Coalition. That is, we’re on track for a dead heat (there’s that sporting language again).

(As an aside, I must say I find it extraordinary seeing pre-election polling come to such precise fruition like this – the accuracy of the predictions is proving uncanny. I guess I’ve never paid opinion polls a huge amount of attention before, so I am struck by just how closely this situation mirrors the forecast, especially because voters did such unpredictable and sometimes unprecedented things in such huge numbers – it’s crazy!)

A hung parliament: our last was in 1940, in other words during WWII, which seems to suggest it’s a fairly extreme, very unusual result.

But is it any bad thing? Well, I think it’s potentially a very good thing. It’s a remarkable occasion to witness the privilege of peaceful democracy at work, and what we have here is Australians, right across the country and political spectrum, registering their discontent with the two major parties. That’s a very healthy expression of political dissatisfaction. The message is so deafening: it’s essentially a vote of no confidence in both directions. People are completely disillusioned and more – totally alienated, I think, by both Gillard and Abbott’s reaching for the Marco Polo ‘safe’ territory in the pool: the edgeless, weightless middle ground. Though they’re coming at it from opposite ends, neither one is a moderate. In the event, it looks like this insufferable pretence hasn’t fooled anyone, so one wonders if they might have been better off standing up for what they actually believe.

As expected, the Greens capitalised on this mounting disaffection with the Labor and Liberal parties. They’re currently celebrating a record result, and the very best of luck to them: they’ll hold the balance of power outright in the Senate, and their man Adam Brandt is one of the crucial players in this question of which party will form a minority government in the lower house. It’s hard to imagine the Greens putting their heads together with the Liberal party, but at the moment, all bets are off; they have to talk to both sides, and the Greens will be growing up fast in this arena, earning their negotiation stripes in record time. My fear for the Greens is that they will find their ideology tested and tarnished by the reality of their new power and prominence – it’s inevitable, because they will have to compromise – and that’s going to be difficult for them, because the Greens and their support base have grown precisely because of their committed principles and to date unswerving agenda on a range of issues. Everyone is going to find it hard watching some of these previously core beliefs fall prey to the harsh blow of political reality. I wish I could believe that they’ll avoid the defilement somehow, but I regret to admit I think they’re going to find life pretty tough at the top.

Then there’s the Independent MPs: Tony Windsor, Bob Katter and Rob Oakeshott. They’re all ex-Nationals, I think, but importantly they’re unhappy ex-Nationals, so it’s not clear they’re about to warmly embrace Tony Abbott’s Coalition. Indeed, Darkling Jenny pointed out yesterday just how much regional and country voters – and their Independent MPs – have in common with some of the more left-leaning concerns of Labor and the Greens: the national broadband network, water security, the environment, food miles, renewables… so the swing to the Greens hasn’t, it seems, come simply from a split Left leaving Labor for the Greens, but also from ex-National voters abandoning the Coalition. What will they do? Unfortunately, we don’t know.

I heard Tony Windsor speaking last night, and felt very reassured by him because he seemed like a considered, intelligent man. Oakeshott is known to prefer Labor’s broadband model, but to my knowledge, there’s nothing stopping the Coalition from adopting a very similar broadband policy in order to secure the support of the Independents and form government. If I’ve got this right, Oakeshott also fell out with the Nationals over his support of the Emissions Trading Scheme (which was eventually scrapped by Labor, thus hammering the first nails in Rudd’s coffin), whereas Abbott doesn’t believe in climate change. So… you have to think there’s a chance for Labor to woo these guys. Bob Katter is widely held to be a little bit crazy. I’d rather share the insanity around, because surely Abbott is dangerous enough, but I don’t know which of the two major parties Katter regards as the lesser evil. In fact, the same applies to all three. Tony Windsor last night was absolutely clear about not discounting either one.

So there we have it. No answers, and no idea of what happens next. Waiting, waiting. But Australians have let their ballots do the talking, and it has resulted in a shake-up that will hopefully shock both Labor and Liberal politicians into the realisation that they must change, and they must do better, because there’s no such thing as the ‘party faithful’ anymore.



  1. litlove said,

    How interesting that the same thing happened in the UK this year. It goes to show that nowadays there are fewer strong ideological differences between the parties, that it’s all personality based campaigning, and for most of us, the personalities of politicians leave a lot to be desired.

    • doctordi said,

      Yes, LL, the parallels with the UK election are really startling. And that’s exactly right – there’s so much grey area now between the two major parties that there’s a much more US/presidential style of campaigning taking hold, and that’s the politics of personality – so it’s especially ironic that both candidates for the top job have so carefully managed a program of concealment around theirs!

  2. Pete said,

    Thanks for explaining the intricacies of Aussie politics. I like the sound of an effective no-confidence vote making the parties and politicians work harder. Whether they’ll work more ethically and considerately is debatable but from the sounds of it neither side deserved to win. And if the Greens can use their swing-vote wisely, then that is likely to be good news for the environment. I’ll be interested to see where both the UK and the Aussie systems go from here.

    • doctordi said,

      Debatable indeed, Pete – but yes, it’s going to make for interesting times both here and in the UK.

  3. Grad said,

    You see, that’s why I am a staunch “independent.” Not wedded to any party or platform. At the very least, I want the person I vote for to be honest with me about his/her vision, beliefs, agenda, as well as be just plain “honest”, to serve the best interests of the constituency and the country rather than self-interest, and to talk as little as possible. (I prefer a little action to a deluge of blabbery). If the candidate has some common sense, so much the better. Unfortunately, those qualities are hard to find in a politician as far as I can discern. It leaves one rather jaded.

    • doctordi said,

      At the very least?? Grad, these days that seems to be asking an awful lot! Jaded is the word. Everyone’s shoulders were slumped at polling booths right around the country.

  4. bookgazing said,

    I felt so well informed when the Australian election turned up on BBC news last week, so ta for making me feel smart 😉

    I like your point that this result shows that people are working the system of democracy to register their discontent. After the UK election, it was all voter blaming and ‘you caused this terrible split in the foundations of power’, so it’s nice to hear someone sane reminding us what a hung parliament can really mean. Best of luck with your political situation and fingers crossed it works out better than ours – whatever happens the voting public tried.

    • doctordi said,

      Oh, cripes, bookgazing, I hope I haven’t given you a bum-steer!!! I’m sure plenty would dispute my interpretation of recent events and of the candidates – but this is my own understanding.

      Yeah, it is, if nothing else, certainly an example of the system at work. The blame game has started here in earnest too, but mainly among the pollies – voters seem to think this is about what they expected. I’ve had several people sum it up by saying, “Neither of them deserved to win,” so the hung parliament is no accident, it is a reflection of the will of the people, so that’s a clear positive out of a very murky situation.

      • bookgazing said,

        Let’s just say the BBC wording of their coverage has not exactly been even handed (for example, very aggressive adjectives used to describe Julia Gillard’s approach to her campaign) so I’m happier having you summing it up than them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: